Is this not just an elaborate argument for hiring you? Partly, obviously. We sell websites and this page sits on our site, and anybody reading it should hold that in mind the whole way down. What we would say in our defence is that four of the five questions in section 05 can be answered in a way that sends you off to build it yourself, section 04 is the actual sequence rather than a teaser version of it, and section 02 says out loud that five products we compete with are better than us at something. A page written purely to win the argument would have none of that in it. The judgement to make is whether the six jobs in section 03 are real, because everything else follows from them, and you can check that against your own experience rather than against us.
If the platforms are that good, what is left for a studio to do? The six jobs, and the fact that they get finished. The honest division of labour is that the software made the assembling trivial and did nothing at all about the thinking or the writing, which is where almost all the value in a website was always sitting. What we are selling is a decision about what the pages are, sentences written by somebody who has done it before, a form that is proven to deliver, and a date. If somebody offers you a cheap site and the thing they are cheap at is the assembling, you are being quoted for the part that stopped being hard.
Why would you publish the method instead of charging for it? Because we cannot see the downside, and because the alternative is worse. A business that follows section 04 and builds a decent site itself was never going to pay us; a business that reads it and realises how many evenings it is has learned something true about its own situation. Both are better outcomes than somebody hiring us under a misunderstanding and resenting it in month three. Everything on this site works the same way — the costs page, the ownership page, the care page — and the rule we hold ourselves to is that each page has to be worth reading to somebody who never contacts us.
And the part we cannot dress up. Skyward is new and has no clients yet, so nothing above is a story about the hundred self-builds we have rescued. There are no testimonials on this site because there are none to print, and the builds in the portfolio are invented businesses, labelled as such on every page of them. The free homepage is not a technique we settled on after years of trying things — it is the only argument a studio with no track record has got, which is exactly why you can rely on us to keep offering it. The first ten clients also get $500 off for helping with the not-having-any problem, in exchange for a review, a testimonial and permission to publish the build.